Epistemic Justice, Safety, And Neurodiversity-Affirming Practice.png
Epistemic Justice, Safety, And Neurodiversity-Affirming Practice.png

Epistemic justice, safety, and neurodiversity-affirming practice: A lived experience-led response to Wade and Waller (2025)

£0.00

Cobbaert, L., Camin, M., Schweizer, K., Kapp, S., Gorrie, L., Maloney, E., � Pavlopoulou, G. (2025)

This lived experience-led critique of Wade and Waller�s (2025) proposed CBT competences highlights significant concerns around iatrogenic harm and epistemic injustice due to a neuronormative, clinician-centric approach. The authors advocate for neurodiversity-affirming, identity-and trauma-informed adaptations that prioritise safety, consent, and co-produced, flexible care. Integrating these principles into CBT frameworks can foster more ethical, inclusive, and effective therapeutic practice for Neurodivergent individuals.


View Resource

Cobbaert, L., Camin, M., Schweizer, K., Kapp, S., Gorrie, L., Maloney, E., � Pavlopoulou, G. (2025)

This lived experience-led critique of Wade and Waller�s (2025) proposed CBT competences highlights significant concerns around iatrogenic harm and epistemic injustice due to a neuronormative, clinician-centric approach. The authors advocate for neurodiversity-affirming, identity-and trauma-informed adaptations that prioritise safety, consent, and co-produced, flexible care. Integrating these principles into CBT frameworks can foster more ethical, inclusive, and effective therapeutic practice for Neurodivergent individuals.


View Resource